Thursday, September 29, 2011

While Reading the Bible

On my computer, I downloaded the Kindle from Amazon.com and then I downloaded the King James version of the Bible.  I have lots of Bibles at home, but I didn't have one copy of the King James version which is the version I like the best.  This kindle is a wonderful tool.  I love how you can just right-click on a word and get the definition, because I'm the type that looks up words as I read and that takes up so much time if you have to thumb through a dictionary or even look it up online.  Anyway, back to my main subject the Bible.

I started reading Genesis.  I don't understand how some Christians can take this literally.  I think that the people who take this literally are people who take everything literally.  There are people who are incapable of understanding metaphor, therefore they are incapable of seeing hidden meanings, the meanings that can only be expressed by Metaphor.  Christianity is so entirely metaphoric, in comparison to Buddhism which isn't at all.  Understanding Christianity takes much more imagination--because that is what it takes to understand metaphors--than Buddhism.  Buddhism is the only other religion that I feel I have more than a cursory knowledge besides Christianity.  I like Buddhism, but I like Christianity better.  I think it's deeper.

I think people forget that the Bible was written by men, spiritual types, but they were still just men.   Genesis says that Adam and Eve ate bread, but that would be impossible, since crops and wheat hadn't been born yet.  In Genesis it said that God punished the snake by making him crawl on his belly and eat dust the rest of his life, but snakes don't eat dust.  They eat small animals.  However, a person writing this without any scientific knowledge, and a primitive mind, might think that was what they eat, because they hadn't any kind of zoological knowledge at that time, nor had the person ever observed a snake closely.

Dietrich  Bonhoffer
I still love the Bible, but I love the book of Psalms the most, because I've gotten the most real spiritual help from that book.  My spiritual hero, Dietrich Bonhoffer, said that one could devote all their religious studies to that one book.  I think he's right.  Everything that a person needs to know about God and about Christianity can be found in that one book.

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

About Reading "Ulysses"

My own stream of consciousness:

This guy takes dental floss out of his pocket and cleans his filthy teach.  I didn't know they had dental floss back in 1904.   Dental floss seems typically American, but I guess I'm wrong.  If the English and Irish had dental floss why such bad teeth.  It's funny that they would use dental floss but not brush their teeth.  By Joyce's writing, I can't tell who it was who was cleaning their teeth in front of other men, but I think it was professor MacHugh because he was the last name mentioned.  Newsboys were so poor in the Ireland of 1904, they didn't wear shoes.  Speaking of not wearing shoes.  That reminds me of a family photo of my ancestors that I found on the Internet.  This seems like a good place to ad a photo for interest.  I digress.


George Washington Vaughan (my 1st cousin 4x removed) with Grandchildren
GWV born 1820 in Hawkins, TN, died 1901 in Tishomingo, MS
the kids look dressed up but they don't have shoes.


September 28, 2011

I was reading a little more of Ulysses today and I was reminded of  e-mail talk.  When Joyce  shows that the person is screaming, he put the words in all caps.  Just like in email.  Other writers usually write something like "Oh shut up!"  Arnold screamed at his mother.  But Joyce, using his Ulysses style, would write OH SHUT UP, and he doesn't even say who is saying it.  The reader is just suppose to know, if he's paying attention.   In Ulysses, Joyce threw away the convention of "he said, she said."  


Joyce also abbreviates words and writes how they sound like rather than using conventional spelling.  It's as if he discovered computer language abt 100 years before computers, and everyone called him a literary genius for writing like that--breaking new ground as they say.  LOL    I rather enjoyed reading Portrait of an Artist as a Young Man, but I'm not enjoying Ulysses as much.  I'm not interested in reading about it when anyone sneezes or takes a crap.  I'm only on page 130 so maybe I will feel different about this book by the end.  Joyce uses lots of Latin phrases in it, all of which seem to have to do with Catholicism, which shows one advantage of a Catholic school education--you get to learn Latin. 



I have another post called "Ineluctible Modality of the Visible" on another blog of mine that you might find interesting.  In it I try to explain what I think that phrase means.




Thursday, September 22, 2011

History Becomes More Alive for Me

Viking Ship represents Denmark's King Valdar (the Mild) Hroarsson, [547-568]
my Viking 41st great-grandfather  
Alfred the Great (849-901)
my 34th Great Grand Uncle
As I've written before, I've been on Ancestry.com tracing my family roots.  This has been one of the most interesting experiences of my life.  It's life altering.  Seeing the broad scope of all my history has given me a completely different outlook on life.  I now see myself as part of a long chain.  I'm not isolated, but a part of something bigger than myself.

I traced my family history back through England to France to the Danes and the Vikings and found out the Vikings migrated to Scandinavia from Afghanistan.  Before Afghanistan they were the Trojans.   Since I found out that King Sceldwea of Troy (born 20 B.C.) was my 65th Great Grandfather, I'm suddenly so interested in Trojan history.  Can you believe.

The most ironic thing happened in doing my family research:  Since I started this blog, I've had the ad for "Meditations" by Marcus Aurelius (the 16th emperor of Rome) on the right side of this blog because it's one of my favorite books.  Then today in researching my family on Ancestry.com, I found out that Marcus Aurelius (86 -161 AD) was my 56th great-grandfather.  Constantine, who brought Christianity to the Roman Empire, was my 50th great-grandfather.  My mind has a very philosophical bent.  Now I'm wondering if that bent is something that could be in the genes.
Marcus Aurelius, Author of "Meditations"
My 56th Great-grandfather

“Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones.”
― Marcus Aurelius


Edward III  (1312-1377)
 King of England
My 18th Great-Grandfather
The point of all of this is that by finding out that you have some kind of relationship to an historic character makes you that much more interested in history.  At least that's how it affects me.  As I read about my ancient ancestors, I'm increasing my knowledge of history more than when I just read out of history books that I feel no connection to.    If children knew about their family history before studying history, it would help them better to relate to history and they would find it that much more interesting.

If all of these people are related to me, that would also mean that they are all related to each other.  As I got into the Romans on Ancestry.com, I found lots of misinformation.


Marcus Antonius (aka Mark Anthony)
(January 14, 83 BC – August 1, 30 BC)
 Roman General
My 63rd Great Grandfather

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Would Hillary Have Been a Better President?

This seems to be a question that people are thinking about out of disappointment with Obama.  It's like what if I would have done this instead of doing what I did.  What would my life have been like.  A person can drive themselves nuts thinking about things like that.  It's an area of thought that should be avoided.

Even though we are now, and I hope temporarily, disappointed in Obama, we forget his positive qualities.  One reason he got elected over Hillary, who had a much better resume, was that Obama could make wonderful speeches, much better than Hillary ever could.  Hillary never said anything that was really inspirational.  Obama's speeches inspired the entire world and helped repair all the damage in our foreign relations that Bush instigated. Foreign countries hated the Bush administration. I think the reason President Obama got the Nobel Peach Prize was just because he gave such good speeches.   Obama has taken out the American hubris in our foreign policy, which was badly needed.  Would Hillary have been able to accomplish that?  Obama is now being looked on as weak, but did Hillary ever come off very strong?  Before being elected President, he came off stronger than she.  It's doubtful that she would have gotten stronger as President.  In his post President years, Bill Clinton has really distinguished himself.  If his wife had gotten elected President, I wonder if he would have done the good same things that he has been doing.

Hillary probably would have received just as much prejudice for being a woman that Obama has received for being mixed race.  Hillary had the advantage of already knowing all the leaders of countries, but that advantage was best used in her being Secretary of State.  That is another good thing that Obama did--he appointed Hillary Secretary of State.  Most Presidents are not that generous to their former adversaries.  He was trying to follow Lincoln's example, which is a good prototype to go by.  Biden has also become a popular and admired vice-president, as Cheney was never able to do.  That was another good pick from President Obama.

This morning on Morning Joe they talked about Obama not having any business experience.  That all he knows about economics and business is what he has read in books.  Hillary never started a business either that I know of.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

More About My Ancestors

The Luther Family Coat of Arms
Every day that I spend on Ancestry.com working on my family tree, I find something totally amazing.  Today was my biggest day yet.  Are you ready for this.  Maybe you should sit down:  Martin Luther (1483-1546) THE Martin Luther, THE German Priest who founded Protestantism, was my 15th Great-Grand Uncle.  There is probably no person in history that I admire more.  Like my lineage to William the Conqueror, this also comes from my mother's side of the family--the Johnsons--the Texas farmers, whom all the rest of my families looked down upon because they were poorer than all the other relatives.

I think I inherited Luther's religious gene, because I'm extremely religious, too, but not so hot on the Catholic Church or organized religion, which is a little ironic because most of my favorite thinkers have been Catholics and I have the Catholic mindset.  I wonder if how spiritual a person is could possibly be in their genes.  No one in my immediate family was religious, but I know it was just in me from the very beginning.

Luther wasn't against Catholicism.  He couldn't stand the hypocrisy of the Catholic Church.  Jesus didn't intend to start a new religion, he just wanted to reform Judism, likewise Luther didn't want to form a new religion, he just wanted to reform the Catholic Church.  There's no one in history I admire more than Martin Luther (not counting Jesus, Plato and Kierkegaard), so it blew my mind to find out he was an ancestor.  I think it's also interesting to learn that a branch of the German Luther family immigrated to England and then after a couple of generations came to America.  I figure they liked the American ideal of religious freedom.



Martin Luther--my 15th Great Grand Uncle

Hans Luther--father to Martin, 
and my 16th  great-grandfather

Margarete Lindemann--Martin Luther's 
Mother and my
16th Great Grandmother
Katharine von Bora--wife of my 
15th great grand uncle Martin Luther

Martin Luther (1483 - 1546) 15th great-grand uncle
Hans Luther (1459 - 1530) Father of Martin - 16th great-grandfather
Jacob Luther (1490 - 1571) Son of Hans - 15th great-grandfather
Johannes Luther (1517 - 1584) Son of Jacob - 14th great-grandfather
Johann Jacob Luther II (1537 - 1558) Son of Johannes - 13th-great grandfather
(immigrated to England from Germany)
Johann Jacob III LUTHER (1561 - 1597) Son of Johann Jacob - 12th-great grandfather
Capt John Samuel Luther (1595 - 1644) - Son of Johann Jacob III - 11th great grandfather
(immigrated to Massachusetts from England)
Elizabeth Luther (1626 - 1687) Daughter of Capt John Samuel - 10th great-grandmother
Abraham Weeks (1625 - 1691)  Son of Elizabeth - 9th great-grandfather
Francis Weekes (1653 - 1715)  Son of Abraham -  8th great-grandfather
Elizabeth Weekes (1678 - 1751)  Daughter of Francis - 7th great-grandmother
George Goodloe (1701 - 1741)  Son of Elizabeth  - 6th great-grandfather
Mary Goodloe (1731 - 1790)  Daughter of George -  5th great grandmother
John Quarles (1746 - 1789) Son of Mary - 4th great-grandfather
Lucy Quarles (1786 - 1854) Daughter of John  - 3rd great-grandmother
Moses J. Johnson Jr. (1832 - 1900) Son of Lucy  - 2nd great-grandfather
Harrison "Hal" C. Johnson (1854 - 1922) Son of Moses J. - my great-grandfather
Raleigh Homer Johnson (1885 - 1952) Son of Harrison "Hal" C. - my maternal grandfather
Frances Louise Johnson (1919 - 1983)  Daughter of Homer - my Mother
Gayle Manning Alstrom (1942 -     ) Daughter of Louise - Me

Thursday, September 8, 2011

My Switch in Personalities


Ink on Paper then manipulated on my computer.
A new technique for me.
I seem to have two sides to me, the right and the left, often referred to the left and right brain.  I think I'm equally right and left brained, but, on two different scales: on a larger scale, the life experience scale, I fluctuate between the two.  For a couple of years, all I can think about is art and I paint and do little artistic projects.  I cancel my subscription to "The Economist," and subscribe to "Cloth Paper and Scissors," instead.  If you visit my blog "Old Woman on a Bicycle," for the past year it's been mostly about art and visiting art exhibits and making videos.  I belong to all the big art museums in town.   However, I haven't written on this blog for over a month, because my mind is shifting again.  I just subscribed to "The Economist" again, and I will probably start writing about politics and history.  I was making a video about one or two a week and now I haven't made one in over a month (see me on YouTube).  Undoubtedly, I will undergo another mental shift back to the art scene, which I've presently lost all interest in.  The last time that I was in one of my artistic periods and then left it, I had no idea I would be interested in doing art again, so I threw a lot of stuff away that I was really sorry about when I re-entered this phase about a year later.  I'm not really good enough at it, to be a professional, but each time that I enter one of these phases, I'm better at it than I was before, and I try to accomplish something before I lose interest again, which now I'm sure I will.  My measure of success in the art world is getting something published.  Getting published is my measuring stick for success no matter what phase I'm living in.  The only question has been, how long do I have before another radical change in interest,  and I go back to reading "The Economist" as though it were the Bible.  By the way, in both phases of my personality, I always read the Bible and the same religious material that I like, like Dietrich Bonhoffer and some Buddhist writing.  My religious interests remain a constant.  I should add that each time I switch back into the other phase, I'm better at what I'm doing than I was before.  Constant emotional and mental growth is a constant in my life.  When I'm in my artistic phase, I don't do much reading, and when I'm in my "left-brained phase" I do.  I actually feel happier in the left-brained phase.  I am very intellectual, and when I'm in the right-brained, or artistic phase, I feel that a part of my brain isn't being exercised significantly.  However, I get some enjoyment in seeing what progress I'm making in my art work.

By the way, besides "Old Woman on a Bicycle" I have another blog called "One American Mind," which is primarily devoted to the left side of my personality, which is the history/political/philosophical side.  I judge which site to post on as to which interest I think it falls into.  If I'm thinking about Obama or Michelle Bachmann, I'll write something on "One American Mind."  My blog "One American Mind" gets twice as many hits as "Old Woman on a Bicycle," but I've also had "One American Mind" for a much longer period of time.

What I really like the most is combining these two sides of my personality into one project.  I've written a novel enititled "That Smooth-Faced Gentleman"  which I published myself.  One reason I liked publishing it myself (which was a mistake) was that I could design the entire book.  I photo I took is on the cover.  I would really hate to have a book published with someone else's art work on the cover, but perhaps I wouldn't mind if it were much better than I could do.  Here's a piece of irony.  The title of my book, which I wrote 10 years ago, is a quote from Shakespeare's play "King John."  I just found out on Ancestry.com that the real King John was an ancestor of mine.






Saturday, September 3, 2011

My Ironic Family History

The following thoughts followed spending last month, probably averaging 6 hours a day, on Ancestry.com.

My family consists of three main branches that I was familiar with up until a couple of months ago when I learned about another one.  The three branches I was familiar with were

The Alstroms - My fathers side of the family, which, since my parents were divorced when I was very young, I knew very little about.  Also my father hated his parents, who had never kept it a secret from him that he had been an unwanted child, and never spoke about them during the times when he would come to visit me.  The only item he ever mentioned about his father was that he owned a beach house in Rehobeth Beach, Deleware, which he told me I would inherit some day and that I should be prepared to accept that much responsibility.  I presume he mean't after he inherited it.  (This never happened).  I learned from my mother that my paternal grandfather was a drunk and that my paternal grandmother's name was Mabel.  My father and grandfather were also of Swedish descent.  I learned on Ancestry.com that my Father's paternal grandfather, Andrew Gustavis Alstrom was born in Skaroberg, Sweden and came to America, at the age of 20, in 1868, settling in Frankfort Kantucky,  After marrying, he soon moved to Baltimore, Md., which became their permanent home and the birthplace of my father.  I figure he probably moved to Maryland because it has a large Swedish community.

My grandfather and grandmother, Mr. and Mrs. John Thomas Alstrom, Sr., visited me only once when I was about ten years old.  I lived with my maternal grandmother in a small apartment in West Los Angeles, and they stopped by for a visit and to meet me.  Right after they left, I said to my grandmother, "I'm glad they're gone, now I can go out and play."  They overheard me as they were walking down the stairs from our apartment and wrote a letter to my grandmother about it.  I learned on Ancestry.com that he died a year or two after that one meeting.

There's other stuff about this side of my family, I'm finding out on Ancestry.com, but I won't go into all that now, because I don't want this entry to be book.

The Mannings of Wichita, Kansas and the Johnsons of Sulphur Springs, Texas

My mother's (Frances Louise Alstrom, nee Johnson,) mother, my grandmother Johnson, was a Manning, from Wichita, Kansas, before marrying her husband Raleigh Homer Johnson, a railway postal clerk, from Sulphur Springs, Texas.  I always got the feeling that, not only Grandmother, but also her family, thought she married below her.  The Johnson family in Sulphur Springs, Texas were farmers and very poor, not that the Mannings of Wichita were particularly educated.  Both family members never graduated high school.  However, the Mannings did seem to make something of themselves in the world.  My great uncle, Phillip Manning, at 16 dropped out of school to work in a grocery story.  At 21 he bought the grocery store.  The grocery story grew into a supermarket, and he became mayor of Wichita (1946-47).  My grandmother Johnson, who also dropped out of high school, later went to a business college and then taught secretarial skills at the college.  She and my mother and then myself were all very competent secretaries.  That's how I learned my extensive computer skills, which seems to be rare for seniors like myself.

My grandmother and grandfather Johnson had a very unhappy marriage and later divorced.  My mother and grandmother always called my grandfather Raleigh, and I only just learned that his family always called him Homer, which was actually his middle name.  They obviously didn't think much of the name Homer.  I know my mother thought farmers were the lowest people on earth.  She always called people farmers whom she thought were the worst.  My mother was also always ashamed about being from Wichita, Kansas.  I think my father didn't help in that regard either.  He considered his family from Maryland far superior, and Maryland a much better and more prestigious place to be from.  I think he thought he married down, too.  I don't think he ever met the Johnson's or ever wanted to, and hadn't much to do with the Mannings.

The Lawrences originally from Kentucky but moved to Sulphur Springs, Texas

I only recently learned that the Johnson family, our Texas branch, had their own branch, the Lawrences.  My  great-grandmother on my Johnson side had the maiden name of Lawrence, whom I got the impression the Johnson family thought superior to themselves.  I don't know if these two families, other than Elizabeth Jane, my great-grandmother had much to do with one another.

I'm coming to the great irony.  Keep patient.

My mother once told me that she had never investigated the Johnson family heritage because she was scared that maybe there had been Negros in it, because so many "colored people" had the last name of Johnson.  My mother was terrified that maybe she had Negro blood in her.

On Ancestry.com, I did extensive research on the Johnson family, which out of her racial prejudice my mother was too fearful to do.  I learned that the Johnson's ancestors were the Plantagenet family of England and that my 18 great-grandfather was King Edward III of England.  King Edward III was the king just before Richard the Second.  Before this all the Johnson ancestory were English and French royalty.  William the Conqueror was my 26th great-grandfather.  I've relayed this information to my Johnson cousin who is now 86, but I don't think she could care less.  How the future generations from English royalty ended up as Texas farmers must be some story.

Below is my family tree on my mother's father's side, from William the Conqueror, but it still goes back much further than that--to the Vikings.
(Information from Ancestry.com)

William I
[aka William the Conqueror]
William I Conqueror (1024 - 1087) is my 26th great grandfather

Henry I Beauclerc (1068 - 1135)
Son of William I
Empress Matilda Countess of Anjou England (1102 - 1167)
Daughter of Henry I
Henry II, Curtmantle, King of England, Plantagenet (1133 - 1189)
Son of Empress Matilda Countess of
John "Lackland" King of England Plantagenet (1166 - 1216)
Son of Henry II, Curtmantle, King of England,
HENRY III King of England PLANTAGENET (1207 - 1272)
Son of John "Lackland" King of England
King Edward I of England Edward Plantagenet (1239 - 1307)
Son of HENRY III King of England
Empress Matilda
Countess of Anjou England
 
King Edward II Plantagenet (1284 - 1327)
Son of King Edward I of England Edward
Edward III "King of England" Plantagenet (1312 - 1377)
Son of King Edward II
John Beauford of Gaunt, Duke of Aquitaine, "1st Duke of Lancaster" King of Castile Plantagenet (1340 - 1399)
Son of Edward III "King of England"
Joan Plantagenet Lady Countess Westmoreland Beaufort (1375 - 1445)
Daughter of John Beauford of Gaunt, Duke of Aquitaine, "1st Duke of Lancaster" King of Castile
Richard Knight of the Garter 5th Earl of Salisbury Neville (1400 - 1460)
Son of Joan Plantagenet Lady Countess Westmoreland
George (Archbishop of York and Chancellor of England) Neville (1432 - 1476)
Son of Richard Knight of the Garter 5th Earl of Salisbury
Alice Neville (1445 - 1498)
Daughter of George (Archbishop of York and Chancellor of England)
Brian Tunstall (1480 - 1513)
Son of Alice
Brian de Tunstall (1510 - 1539)
Son of Brian
Richard Tunstall (1539 - 1586)
Son of Brian de
Edmund Tunstall (1585 - 1635)
Son of Richard
Edmund Tunstall or Turnstall (1628 - 1694)
Son of Edmund
Marshall Tunstall (1673 - 1699)
Son of Edmund
Jane Tunstall (1700 - 1751)
Daughter of Marshall
Roger Quarles II (1720 - 1790)
Son of Jane
Harrison "Hal" Johnson
My great grandfather
John Quarles (1746 - 1789)
Son of Roger
Lucy Quarles (1786 - 1854)
Daughter of John
Moses J. Johnson Jr. (1832 - 1900)
Son of Lucy
Harrison "Hal" C. Johnson (1854 - 1922)
Son of Moses J.
[my great grandfather]
Raleigh Homer Johnson (1885 - 1952)
Son of Harrison "Hal" C.
[my grandfather]
Frances Louise Johnson (1919 - 1983)
Daughter of Raleigh Homer
Raleigh Homer Johnson
My maternal grandfather
Gayle Manning Alstrom
That's me.